The general concensus, is that it is a Cartel that currently controls the world and fully intends to maintain control over all people and all governments. A cartel is generally made up of familes or bloodlines; these families would maintain residence in many different countries so they have no allegience to any particular country. Often times people say the New World Order is a global government that the cartel is trying to create; but we would say the cartel already has world control; so maybe its best to think of this new global government as simply an extension of their existing global control. To identify these cartel members is challenging; and the best way is to trace who holds U.S. government (or any government) debt; even if financial institutions such as banks own this debt; eventually it leads to particular families who have controlling interest in these corporations. What makes these families nervous, is that citizens of the world will unite and demand that their elected officials simply wipe out government debt, owed to these families. If the U.S. for example owes a bank 100 Trillion dollars; we would just say forget it the debt is wiped out, if you don't like it lets fight it out with the U.S. Marines. The collection of all U.S. taxes, is only paying the interest on the debt we owe (not the principal); it is inevitable that the U.S. is bankrupt and is going to declare this debt null and void sooner or later. Of course we are bankrupt predominately at the hands of the same cartel criminals in the first place. Eventually however, the cartel will force another country (most likely China or Russia) to launch a major attack against the U.S. once we try to wipe out this paper debt. Now many experts would claim that the cartel is largely Jewish (rothschilds, rockefellers, etc.) this is still not validated as it remains very difficult to pinpoint the cartel and their agents. But evidence seems to be mounting that this New World Order cartel most certainly exists; and has a grip on most countries.
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This